PDA

View Full Version : Give the White Man His Due


bogsvarog
05-06-08, 03:01
Give the White Man His Due

By Peter Anthony

Today, if one is to believe the constant anti-white, hate-filled and bigoted Establishment propaganda, the white man is the greatest source of evil and unrighteousness in the world. Waves and waves of this propaganda spread the lie that whites are always the victimizers -but never the victim- and have meant nothing but ill towards the "always benevolent races," which have surrounded her lands. As the propagandists teach, Whites -especially those who would preserve their race- are the lowest form of life on earth, to be despised and persecuted, rooted out and exposed as heretics if they do not toe the Multi-Cultural Party line. With their constant encouragement of race-mixing and cover-ups of genuine cases of anti-white genocide throughout history (the Bolshevik revolution, Stalin and the bloody work of his Jewish controllers, deportations and murders of millions of Germans after WWII, etc.), it is quite clear to growing numbers of thinking people that the Establishment seeks the destruction of the White race.

This article is meant to grant them their wish, to suppose that whites had never graced the lands of this planet with their creativity and intelligence. Where would the establishment be? This effort will merely scratch the surface of white creativity. Indeed, it would take hundreds of pages to detail it all.

Throughout history, no other people have contributed to the betterment of mankind -of all races- than the White race. The "Aryan mind" has been the source of genius, the prime cultivator of technology, and the driving force of progress. Aryans have always been the source of High Culture.

There is the work of Archimedes, inventor of the lever and pulley; the Archimedean screw, used to lift water for irrigation; the catapult; and the concepts of hydrostatics and buoyancy, among others. Many other ancients have been responsible for the basic inventions that all succeeding generations have drawn upon, from the wheel to basic math and science concepts. Would you throw it all away? The breadth of work by Italian Leonardo da Vinci nearly stuns the mind. His almost workable plans for such revolutionary concepts as the movable bridge, construction crane, a flying machine, the parachute, and other ideas, became realities due to other White contributions to the fulfillment of these ideas.

Driving a car or other vehicle, on land or water is enjoyed by nearly all. But for the contributions of Germans such as Karl Benz, Gottlieb Daimler, and Wilhelm Maybach to automobile technology, how far would we go? Daimler and Maybach were the first to invent an internal combustion engine light enough to power an automobile; and that they did, though only with three wheels at first. They had perfected a motor bicycle as far back as 1885; a four wheeled car in 1886, and by 1926 had combined with motor vehicle pioneer Karl Benz to form Mercedes-Benz, "Mercedes" being Karl's daughter.

German Rudolf Diesel invented the economic and efficient diesel engine. Men like brothers Charles and Frank Duryea built the first successful gas power automobile on American shores. Vincent Bendix's "Bendix-drive" made hand-cranking an engine obsolete. Henry Ford, the father of mass-production, not to mention white patriot and grand exposer of the Jews, made his Model-T available to the masses and produced the first V-8 engine. Countless others have made critical contributions to modern automotive technology.

How about the works of other Germans? Rudolf Bunsen invented the gas heater called the Bunsen burner, used in tens of thousands of laboratories and schools, for learning and developing a multitude of ways to benefit our lives. Johannes Gutenberg, as early as the 15th century, developed a movable type mold, first mass-producing the Bible, then other books. The Jewish author of æGermany Must PerishÃâ€Â* surely did not take into account GutenbergÃâ€Â*s contribution to the publishing of his vile and vindictive book of genocidal hatred. Elias Howe invented a practical sewing machine in 1846. Karl von Sauerbronn developed the first bicycle as early as 1816. The Siemens brothers pioneered electric railways and lighting, deep-sea telegraph cables, an open-hearth steel-making process, and greatly improved electroplating procedures. These Germans, and many thousands more, have contributed much to your way of life.

We all enjoy the ready availability of clothing. Would you do without the works of Sir Richard Arkwright, who, as early as 1769, developed a water-powered spinning machine? Edmund Cartwright and Samuel Crompton also made critical advances in weaving technology. Other Whites have also contributed to the development of the textile industry, which we all benefit from.

Enjoy flying? Would you do without the Whites who invented the airplane, who developed it through its infant stages? The Wright brothers, Samuel Langley, Glenn Curtis, and others began the process. Frenchman Henri Coanda, developed the first airplane to run on a jet propulsion system and, in an entirely different vein of inventive genius, developed a way to convert salt water to freshwater by using the energy of the sun. Multitudes of Whites have contributed to these amazing industries. It would take volumes to detail them all.

How about feeding the masses -not only of our own country- but other nations? Where would we be without John DeereÃâ€Â*s basic, revolutionary steel plow? Cyrus McCormick invented a reaping machine which is largely credited for the 19th century revolution in agriculture. Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin which helped the South stand on her own two feet. Michael Cudahy developed cold-storage for meat packing, quite a revolutionary and healthy concept. There are many more where those came from. We not only feed many other nations, but give them machinery and teach them so they may one day provide for themselves. Would they have come up with these things on their own? Thousands of years of their bleak history say otherwise.

Whites have also done wonders for the fields of communication. Would you prefer that Samuel Morse had never invented the telegraph, or Morse code; or that Alexander Graham Bell had never invented the telephone? Edwin Howard Armstrong discovered a concept known as frequency modulation. Those of us who are technologically illiterate know this as FM radio. Walter House Brattain, John Bardeen, and William Shockley developed the transistor, and shared a Nobel Prize for it. Italian Guglielmo Marconi invented the wireless telegraph. Lee De Forest improved wireless telegraphy, and revolutionized radio broadcasting with his invention of the triode vacuum tube, an item which is now basic to long distance radio and television communication. Nicholai Tesla also made dramatic improvements in the field of radio communication.

How about that inventor of inventors; White man extraordinare, Thomas Alva Edison, who - to this day - is unsurpassed in the number of U.S./International Patents issued. He and his White staff invented and improved on many of our staple inventions, such as motion pictures, telephone transmitters, typewriters, electronic generators, the mimeograph machine, and phonograph. He and Tesla invented such modern necessities as the electric light bulb. Enjoy flipping a switch and reading at night? YouÃâ€Â*ve got White men to thank.

Here are just a few of the many other Whites who have contributed to invention. Robert Fulton built the first steam-powered river boat, and helped develop early submarine and canal technology. Enjoy taking and looking at photographs? We have pioneers such as Edwin Land and Belgian-American Leo Hendrick Baekeland to thank. After Englishman Dr. DunlopÃâ€Â*s initial discoveries Charles Goodyear perfected the process of vulcanized rubber, thus allowing for longevity of tires. Percy Spencer invented the microwave oven. Nicholai Tesla and Willis Carrier both made critical contributions to the air-conditioning process which makes all of our lives easier today. Many Americans cannot imagine what life would be like without air-conditioning, and theyÃâ€Â*ve got White men to thank.

Peter Cooper built the first American steam locomotive, the Tom Thumb. William Burroughs developed the first adding and calculating machines, forerunners of many, many things to come, including the cash-register. LetÃâ€Â*s not forget those White men who developed early computer technology; like Vannevar Bush, who built the first analog computer in 1930, Blaise Pascal, Charles Babbage, George Boole, and countless others who have contributed to this modern marvel that has touched all our lives.

What would life be like without all of these inventions? Better? Would any of the above exist? Well, donÃâ€Â*t be a hypocrite. Throw away all your technology! Go build a lean-to in the woods and try, just try, to live like the primitive cultures. See if you can. Remember what has happened to every nation . . . when Whites have left. What if there were no White people on the face of this world? Would you now destroy the White race?

There are other inventions and inventors, countless others. This paper has only scratched the surface, and has not even made an effort to delve into the enormous White contributions to art and cultural history. White history is indeed glorious, and it is time White children started looking into it. It is high time we gave the White man his due!

****************************

By oppression, woes and pains
By your sons in servile chains
We will drain our dearest veins
But they shall be free - (Robert Burns)

Алекса
06-06-08, 03:39
Интересантно је слушати заговорнике једнакости шта имају да кажу на ову тему. Обично се њихови разлози своде на клишее, које би свако од нас у дебатама морао да зна да оповргне без проблема.

Рецимо, они кажу, белци су вековима тлачили црнце који су им служили као робови. Један од могућих одговора на то - еволуција не траје вековима, већ миленијумима. Ако црнци јесу били робови, то је било пар векова уназад. Пре тога, док је Европа имала Дантеа, Микеланђела, Да Винчија, у Африци су црнци јели једни друге, а за точак изгледа ни данас не знају, јер носе ствари углавном на главама.

Даље, тврди се да је еволутивни неуспех црне расе последица климатских услова Африке. Одговор - клима није била увек таква каква је сада. Док је ледено доба владало већим делом Европе, Африка није била баш тако топла као данас. Најразвијеније цивилизације биле су Египатска, а касније и Персијска. За то време, дивља племена Нубије, дакле црне расе, били су баш то - дивљаци, кои су успели заузети Египат једино због тога што их је било премного.

Још даље, неко мало орнији да докаже "једнакост" црне расе, почеће да набраја црне научнике (или Јеврејске, или било какве друге). Објасните им да постоји знатна разлика између стварања, и простог копирања. Мајмун из џунгле се исто тако може дресирати да ради ствари одређеним редоследом, за награду (банану), али то њега не ставља у ранг покретача, ствараоца, из кога вири креативна снага кроз сваки његов корак. Број оваквих црних научника (ако их и има уопште), је мизеран.

На крају, зна се врло добро шта је то изашло из мозгова црне расе - гомила там там там ритмова, неусклађених акорада, речник манира дивљака, раскалашни стил облачења... Није ни чудо, доказано је већ одавно да људи црне расе имају најмањи коефицијент интелигенције, а рекорд у овом пољу држе Бушмани са 65.

bogsvarog
06-06-08, 09:30
Fury at DNA pioneer's theory: Africans are less intelligent than Westerners

Celebrated scientist attacked for race comments: "All our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the testing says not really"

By Cahal Milmo


One of the world's most eminent scientists was embroiled in an extraordinary row last night after he claimed that black people were less intelligent than white people and the idea that "equal powers of reason" were shared across racial groups was a delusion.

James Watson, a Nobel Prize winner for his part in the unravelling of DNA who now runs one of America's leading scientific research institutions, drew widespread condemnation for comments he made ahead of his arrival in Britain today for a speaking tour at venues including the Science Museum in London.

The 79-year-old geneticist reopened the explosive debate about race and science in a newspaper interview in which he said Western policies towards African countries were wrongly based on an assumption that black people were as clever as their white counterparts when "testing" suggested the contrary. He claimed genes responsible for creating differences in human intelligence could be found within a decade.

The newly formed Equality and Human Rights Commission, successor to the Commission for Racial Equality, said it was studying Dr Watson's remarks "in full". Dr Watson told The Sunday Times that he was "inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa" because "all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really". He said there was a natural desire that all human beings should be equal but "people who have to deal with black employees find this not true".

His views are also reflected in a book published next week, in which he writes: "There is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so."

The furore echoes the controversy created in the 1990s by The Bell Curve, a book co-authored by the American political scientist Charles Murray, which suggested differences in IQ were genetic and discussed the implications of a racial divide in intelligence. The work was heavily criticised across the world, in particular by leading scientists who described it as a work of "scientific racism".

Dr Watson arrives in Britain today for a speaking tour to publicise his latest book, Avoid Boring People: Lessons from a Life in Science. Among his first engagements is a speech to an audience at the Science Museum organised by the Dana Centre, which held a discussion last night on the history of scientific racism.

Critics of Dr Watson said there should be a robust response to his views across the spheres of politics and science. Keith Vaz, the Labour chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, said: "It is sad to see a scientist of such achievement making such baseless, unscientific and extremely offensive comments. I am sure the scientific community will roundly reject what appear to be Dr Watson's personal prejudices.

"These comments serve as a reminder of the attitudes which can still exists at the highest professional levels."

The American scientist earned a place in the history of great scientific breakthroughs of the 20th century when he worked at the University of Cambridge in the 1950s and 1960s and formed part of the team which discovered the structure of DNA. He shared the 1962 Nobel Prize for medicine with his British colleague Francis Crick and New Zealand-born Maurice Wilkins.

But despite serving for 50 years as a director of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island, considered a world leader in research into cancer and genetics, Dr Watson has frequently courted controversy with some of his views on politics, sexuality and race. The respected journal Science wrote in 1990: "To many in the scientific community, Watson has long been something of a wild man, and his colleagues tend to hold their collective breath whenever he veers from the script."

In 1997, he told a British newspaper that a woman should have the right to abort her unborn child if tests could determine it would be homosexual. He later insisted he was talking about a "hypothetical" choice which could never be applied. He has also suggested a link between skin colour and sex drive, positing the theory that black people have higher libidos, and argued in favour of genetic screening and engineering on the basis that "stupidity" could one day be cured. He has claimed that beauty could be genetically manufactured, saying: "People say it would be terrible if we made all girls pretty. I think it would great."

The Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory said yesterday that Dr Watson could not be contacted to comment on his remarks.

Steven Rose, a professor of biological sciences at the Open University and a founder member of the Society for Social Responsibility in Science, said: "This is Watson at his most scandalous. He has said similar things about women before but I have never heard him get into this racist terrain. If he knew the literature in the subject he would know he was out of his depth scientifically, quite apart from socially and politically."

Anti-racism campaigners called for Dr Watson's remarks to be looked at in the context of racial hatred laws. A spokesman for the 1990 Trust, a black human rights group, said: "It is astonishing that a man of such distinction should make comments that seem to perpetuate racism in this way. It amounts to fuelling bigotry and we would like it to be looked at for grounds of legal complaint."


А ко смо ми да противречимо једном Нобеловцу!? :smash:

Алекса
07-06-08, 01:13
Види само како се диже прашина око једне тако очигледне чињенице. Лавеж оних који тако бурно реагују, је последица тога што они просто немају других аргумената. Наука је независна од политичких хтења, и од онога што би се можда неком допало да презентује као истину. Ни сви светски конгреси, сва квази удружења, симпозијуми, не могу да сакрију истину која се сваким даном све више и више пробија у свет - то је да су људи црне расе најмањег коефицијента интелигенције од свих других, и да разлог за то лежи у њиховим генима, ни у чем другом. Преузимање црначке културе, навика или обичаја просто је једнако срозавању на ниво интелектуалне животиње. Не прихватајући оно што нам се од јеврејских медија сервира преко телевизије и осталих медија, ми остајемо верни свом духу, и ономе што ми јесмо - на тај начин ми чувамо оно што су нам Богови подарили, гене белих Аријских Индо-Европљана, усађене миленијумима у нас кроз наше претке, и виталне кроз нас саме и наше потомке.

bogsvarog
07-06-08, 17:28
Никако да нађу неки противаргумент овој научној чињеници, да га научно оборе, докажу супротно. Него када се тако нешто објави од стране признатог научника, аутоматски му се лепи етикета "расисте,фашисте,нацисте...итс.".

Преузимање црначке културе, навика или обичаја просто је једнако срозавању на ниво интелектуалне животиње. Не прихватајући оно што нам се од јеврејских медија сервира преко телевизије и осталих медија, ми остајемо верни свом духу, и ономе што ми јесмо - на тај начин ми чувамо оно што су нам Богови подарили, гене белих Аријских Индо-Европљана, усађене миленијумима у нас кроз наше претке, и виталне кроз нас саме и наше потомке.Као нпр. данашњи клинци који слушају (к)реп, илити српски речено звукови џунгле. Гестикулацијом и туп туп мелодијом као и текстовима 98% посвећеним криминалу, дроги и курвама враћају еволуцију наше омладине на ниво просечног мајмуна

Алекса
08-06-08, 03:32
Није баш у вези с темом, али имам једну опаску на твој коментар о све већој популарности џунгла - културе, појаве која је последњих година јако присутна и код нас. Причали смо о Розенбергу и "Миту 20. века", ево шта он каже о дегенерацији у уметности:

Суштина свег хаотичног развоја лежи у губитку оног узвишеног идеала лепоте који, у толико пуно облика и манифестација, је био камен темељац свог Европског уметничког стваралаштва. Демократске, расно деструктивне доктрине и метрополиси који су уништитељи народног духа, уједињени су са намерном делатношћу декомпозиције од стране Јевреја. Резултат је тај да су не само идеологије и идеје државе пропале, већ је с њима и пропала уметност Нордијског Запада.

Розенберг је ово писао пре више од 70 година, али је погодио у центар - данас се као прави разлог пропасти културе Европе и све веће декаденције унутар ње саме, не може узети ништа друго до овог што је Алфред Розенберг схватио још тада. Знајући ово, није ни чуо што је идеал Нордијске Европе замењен узорима са Јамајке и њима сличним. Залуђени мозгови желе да представе како је заправо изузетно интересантно бити неки расафаријанац рецимо, док је идеал великих Европских научника попут Леонарда или Тесле гурнут на страну. При свему овоме, разумљиво је да они који пропагирају расну једнакост нису ништа друго него битанге и обични лажови.